HEALTHY RESULT

Sa‘id ibn Abi ‘Arubah (d. 157 AH), a well-known Tabi‘i scholar, the disciples of the Companions of the Prophet once defined a true scholar, saying:“Do not consider someone a scholar who has not listened to differing opinions.” (Jami‘ Bayan al-‘Ilm by Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr, Report No. 1521)

Here, “differing opinions” does not refer to false criticism or baseless accusations. It refers to academic disagreement. Serious scholarly disagreement is such a valuable thing that any genuine scholar would eagerly welcome it, rather than take offense or attempt to shut it down.

Knowledge is such an expansive treasure that no single mind can contain it all. That is why every sincere scholar is deeply eager—almost to the point of urgency—to meet someone who will disagree with them, so that new dimensions of knowledge may open up, and so that they can enrich their own understanding through the knowledge of others.

Furthermore, the value of such disagreement and dialogue extends beyond what one can learn from others. It also enables scholars to refine their own thinking. Through these exchanges, they can clarify and structure their thoughts more precisely and comprehensively.

The truth is that a genuine academic debate—even one with strong disagreements—is one of the most fulfilling experiences for a person dedicated to knowledge and the pursuit of truth. Such a moment is like plunging into the ocean of knowledge together—an experience that is both intensely joyful and deeply enriching.

In today’s world, because false critics have become so widespread, many people have started to view even genuine criticism negatively. But the difference between the two is like night and day. If false criticism is a stench, then true criticism is a fragrance. If false criticism is a thorn, then true criticism is a beautiful flower.

False criticism is a form of destruction. In contrast, true criticism is a constructive process—one that deserves to be continuously upheld in all circumstances.